Time given back
The task leaves the human flow. Your teams keep the judgement.
Invoices, reminders, orders. One whole process, executed alone, under rules you write.
Match invoices to purchase orders, prepare payment, work up the discrepancies.
The task leaves the human flow. Your teams keep the judgement.
Twice the files, not twice the people.
The Friday 6pm check is worth the Tuesday morning one.
The cost to remove, the act that commits, the limit that protects.
A payment goes out.
Bounded by amount ≤ €5,000 and supplier on file, otherwise human approval
An order is created in the ERP.
Bounded by ERP write allowed, exceptional discount never without the account owner
An access right is granted.
Bounded by standard profiles granted, finance-system access co-signed
A customer record is modified.
Bounded by qualitative fields editable, deal value and stage reserved to the rep
A real scope, clear limits, then measured gains before the scope expands.
The scope expands only when these three measures justify the next step.
The agent takes a real scope, proves its value, then you decide what it takes on next.
Volume, time per unit, loaded cost.
On your real files. It sends, writes, pays nothing.
Alone, escalated, never. It cannot rewrite them.
It handles real files within the limits you set.
Volume handled, time returned, cost removed. Then you expand or stop.
action payment INV-2291 amount 4,180.00 EUR rule amount ≤ €5,000 chain verified
The process executed end to end, on your infrastructure.
Rights, caps, trail. Steerable without us.
The second process costs less than the first.
It is what you keep.
It acts through the capabilities it was granted.
The model cannot ignore or rewrite it.
Done, refused, why, how much.
The agent wanted to pay €40,000. The cap was €5,000. Nothing went out.
Done, refused, why, how much. That is what measures the return.
Your data never passes through us.
Public code, platform on your side. If we disappear, your agents keep running.
An injection changes what the agent wants to do, not what it may do.
What is not granted does not happen. Sixteen modelled attacks re-run, sixteen blocked.
Method, path, body, timestamp, one-use token.
Changing model rewrites no guardrail.
redteam/empirical-results.json · 8d0573a · 19 August 2026
Once, per process. Fixed scope, amount and date.
Annual subscription, volume of acts included.
Beyond that, a fraction of what it costs you today.
It will. It can only do what was granted, under your caps. Every act leaves a receipt, so the mistake is found and corrected.
Three lines: deployment once, platform yearly, executed act beyond the included volume. Scoping gives the exact figure before any commitment.
No. The platform runs on your infrastructure. We host nothing.
Two weeks of scoping, then a project whose length depends on how many systems to connect. Always on a real scope.
To steer an agent, no. To build a second one without us, yes.
An agency sells days and leaves. We leave a platform you control, and we go to production.
The platform runs on your side, the control code is open. Your agents keep running.
The first three companies in production set the measurement with us. Their result will be the first one we publish.
Apply with my processThree minutes, out loud. You get its yearly cost and what an agent can take out of it.